Monday, 3 November 2014
Genre Theories.
I am going to look at the genre of rap and analyse some videos so that |I understand this theory more.
Female artists in this genre;
Nicki Minaj:
Iggy Azalea:
Azealia Banks:
Male artists in this genre;
50 Cent:
Lil Wayne:
Drake:
For this genre, the sex of the artist depends on how their videos look and the conventions for both are similar in ways but are also very different due to the one difference of their gender.
In the male rap artist's videos, the men are seen to be fully clothed, and are also seen to be glared at by women who find them sexually pleasing. This shows the artist in a dominant way and shows how they have power within the video. This is because they don't do anything to be admired for in the videos, the women are simply attracted to them. In these videos, the women are seen to be wearing very little clothing, which relates to the Male Gaze Theory of Laura Mulvey as this shows that the women are seen in the media as objects and are there to be looked at by and to please men.
(examples from the videos)
For the videos that are made by the female artists, they are again seen to be wearing little to hardly any clothing as they are females. This instantly stereotypes them to being objects and being in the media to please men and to look nice. This may be seen by some as their right to do what they want with their body and they may feel liberated to be seen in this way in their videos. In the videos for the songs, the camera focuses a lot on the curves of the female body, especially on their bottom. In all three of the videos, the costumes that are worn by the artists are very revealing. In the Anaconda video, Nicki Minaj is seen in one seen to be wearing a tiny pink thong, in the Booty video, Iggy Azalea and Jennifer Lopez are wearing costumes that are showing their bottoms in a sexual way, and in Chasing Time, Azealia Banks is seen to be wearing a costume that covers her body, but she has her breasts on show with only a tiny piece of material covering her nipples.
(examples from the videos)
Representation Theories.
A video demonstrating the representation theory;
I think this video is good to illustrate how men and women are represented in today's media. This is because they have used stereotypes in an ironic way and this makes the video entertaining to watch, because it makes the video funny. The artists have represented the males and females in opposing ways in this video which I think is to show their thoughts on the media and how women are treated unequally. The females are shown as the dominant ones in this video and are seen fully clothed, illustrating their power in each shot. This is the other way round in the way the male actors are seen though, as they have short shorts on in scenes and are seen trying to be sexual towards the artists, which is how Laura Mulvey states that women are seen in the media. They are seen to be 'sexual objects' and that they are 'there to please men'.
It is clear from the title of the song that this particular video would have provocative dancing in and would represent the women artists as sexual. In this video, the camera focuses a lot on the curves of their bodies, particularly their bottoms as this is what the song is about. I think that this song was simply created so that they could make this video to appeal to men, maybe spark controversy and receive millions of views from all different age groups and backgrounds. This isn't what the music industry should be about, but in the society we live in today it is what happens whether we agree with it or not.
Because this video is explicit with the swearing, but is implicit with how some of the wording is sexual, I think that this video is inappropriate for this artist to do as she has quite a lot of young fans. Although it is clear that the video is inappropriate for some audiences, I think that this is just how Nicki Minaj has been from the beginning of her career, so I do not see why there was so much controversy with this video. Because of this controversy towards the video, it led to people talking about it and ended up with millions of views in no time. This was how she broke the VEVO record (previously held by Miley Cyrus with Wrecking Ball) for the most views in 24 hours, which received 19.6 million views in just one day.
This video by Rihanna was seen to be so explicit, sexual and outrageous that it was actually taken down by YouTube, but then was allowed to be reuploaded later on. The video contains women swinging on poles and dancing sexually, and the camera represents the women as objects through how it focuses on their curves and the assets that men find sexually appealing. I think that the reason this video was seen by a lot of people as inappropriate was because it is something that Rihanna doesn't usually do. This is due to her young fanbase and their parents being annoyed at how this role model had shown herself in this way, allowing young girls to think that they can do the same things and it is okay.
Stereotypes and labels can sometimes benefit an artist, as it has done for the multi-award-winning American artist Taylor Swift:
(At 10:20pm on the 19/03/2015, this video had accumulated 656,404,554 views)
This song is very ironic and illustrates Tessa Perkins Stereotype Theory perfectly. This song is all about how the media portray Taylor Swift as a woman who dates countless men and easily jumps from one to another. She has illustrated this in the video, which has gone on to be very successful and has sold hundreds od thousands of copies. She has used the media against itself and won, which demonstrates how successful she is and how dedicated her fans are towards her.
(At 10:23pm, on the 19/03/2015 this song had accumulated 669,078,934 views)
This is another music video from Swift, in which she again uses the media's representation of herself against them and has made money from it as the song has proved to be very successful. This is simply about people having negative impressions of her, and how she just ignores it and does what she wants to. This delivers a very positive message to everyone - especially Taylor Swift's fans, who are quite young mainly - and she uses stereotypes within the music video to make it relatable to everyone watching it.
Audience Theories.
View Audience Theories.pptx and other presentations by lewisstewart7.
The video I am going to look at for Stuart Hall's Reception Theory is 'Wrecking Ball' by Miley Cyrus, as I think this will be interesting to watch for this particular theory. The video currently has 723,000,000+ views, which illustrates how popular the song is. I think the video is this popular due to how the artist used to have a 'Disney' image, and she then changed this by cutting her hair and 'murdering' her persona 'Hannah Montana'.
Dominant: The meaning of this song is how she is in love with someone and doesn't have this person in her life any more. She felt she was restricted in the relationship and this was causing her pain as she isn't getting what she wants. The wrecking ball reflects the destruction in the relationship and how this caused pain for her.
Negotiated: Some viewers of the song will see this as inappropriate for the artist to do (especially parents of young fans of the artist). They understand how the video reflects the lyrics of the song and how the artist being naked is supposed to represent her being 'stripped' of power in the relationship, but think that this could have been done in a different way which would be suitable for audiences of all ages.
Oppositional: People feel the song is completely inappropriate and the video is irrelevant to the lyrics. They feel that the artist has taken off her clothes for no reason except getting attention from heterosexual males, which joins with Laura Mulvey's Male Gaze Theory, as she suggests that females in the media are seen as objects and are there to simple be looked at.
I think that this video was done by Miley to be taken seriously in the industry and not to be seen in the way that she was as she played the character Hannah Montana. I think that this was a clever way to be noticed as she caused people to talk, and she was quoted to say 'If you're going to make people talk, it should be for 2 weeks and not 2 seconds'. I think this is what she did when she released this video, due to it still being a popular song today, a year after its release.
The video I am going to look at for Stuart Hall's Reception Theory is 'Wrecking Ball' by Miley Cyrus, as I think this will be interesting to watch for this particular theory. The video currently has 723,000,000+ views, which illustrates how popular the song is. I think the video is this popular due to how the artist used to have a 'Disney' image, and she then changed this by cutting her hair and 'murdering' her persona 'Hannah Montana'.
Dominant: The meaning of this song is how she is in love with someone and doesn't have this person in her life any more. She felt she was restricted in the relationship and this was causing her pain as she isn't getting what she wants. The wrecking ball reflects the destruction in the relationship and how this caused pain for her.
Negotiated: Some viewers of the song will see this as inappropriate for the artist to do (especially parents of young fans of the artist). They understand how the video reflects the lyrics of the song and how the artist being naked is supposed to represent her being 'stripped' of power in the relationship, but think that this could have been done in a different way which would be suitable for audiences of all ages.
Oppositional: People feel the song is completely inappropriate and the video is irrelevant to the lyrics. They feel that the artist has taken off her clothes for no reason except getting attention from heterosexual males, which joins with Laura Mulvey's Male Gaze Theory, as she suggests that females in the media are seen as objects and are there to simple be looked at.
I think that this video was done by Miley to be taken seriously in the industry and not to be seen in the way that she was as she played the character Hannah Montana. I think that this was a clever way to be noticed as she caused people to talk, and she was quoted to say 'If you're going to make people talk, it should be for 2 weeks and not 2 seconds'. I think this is what she did when she released this video, due to it still being a popular song today, a year after its release.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)